Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Cases

The web site at this domain name was run by a 12 year old boy whose nickname was pokey.

Reverse domain name hijacking cases. Dent purchased these domains to. There are some clear instances however that serve as an example of the behavior often called reverse domain name hijacking. Reverse domain name hijacking means using the in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain name holder of a domain name. These three cases.

Specifically according to the udrp rules rdnh is defined as follows. Initiating domain name dispute resolution proceedings necessarily involves putting the parties to a considerable expenditure of time and in many cases cost and the. These three cases illustrate what has come to be called reverse domain name hijacking 25 in which a trademark owner covets an existing domain name and seeks to gain possession of the domain name by launching a challege in nsi s court where the challenger almost always wins without consideration of the merits. D2008 1313 oct 27 2008.

Case no domain name complainant decision date. This often intimidates domain name owners into transferring ownership of their domain names to trademark owners to avoid legal action. Reverse domain name hijacking. A reverse domain hijacking occurs when the owner of a brand attempts to gain control of a domain name legitimately registered by another party through making false claims.

An example may be where a web site has been in existence for many years under a generic word based domain and a new business starts up under the same or similar name. Brendan hight mdnh inc wipo case no. Credit repair cloud filed the udrp despite claiming common law and registered rights gained after the respondent registered the domain name. Reverse domain name hijacking also known as reverse cybersquatting or commonly abbreviated as rdnh occurs where a rightful trademark owner attempts to secure a domain name by making cybersquatting claims against a domain name s cybersquatter owner.

Reverse domain name hijacking is the practice of a trademark owner suing or pressuring a domain name holder into relinquishing their rightfully owned domain name. Reverse domain name hijacking. Case no domain name complainant decision date. Misleading citations used as part of a domain name hijacking attempt.

You can also use the search page to filter the cases with reverse domain name hijacking decision. Sample decisions finding reverse domain hijacking. Reverse domain name hijacking means using the in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain name holder of a domain name. Thus the distinction between legitimate competing claims and cases of reverse domain name hijacking may be unclear.

Reverse domain name hijacking means using the udrp in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain name holder of a domain name.